494 So. 2d 705 - Parrish v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State (1997), Powe v. State (1991)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. Kibbe · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Namet v. United States · Walker v. United States · Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]hysical force that overcomes earnest resistance or a threat, express or implied, that places a person in fear of immediate death or serious physical injury to himself or another person.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“"As a threshold consideration, this court is required to view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution. Gullatt v. State , 409 So.2d 466 (Ala.Crim.App. 1981); Smelcher v. State , 385 So.2d 653 (Ala.Crim.App. 1980). Where the evidence raises a question of fact which, if believed by the jury would be sufficient to sustain the conviction, the denial of a motion for acquittal or new trial will not be considered error. Young v. State , 283 Ala. 676 , 220 So.2d 843 (1969); Baker v. State , 338 So.2d 528 (Ala.Crim.App. 1976). Any conflict in the evidence *Page 575 presents a question for the jury. Hughes v. State , supra [ 412 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982)]; Minnifield v. State , 406 So.2d 1055 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, Ex Parte Minnifield , 406 So.2d 1060 (Ala. 1981)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[t]he force was evident from the fact that the victim was held down by the appellant, who placed his foot over her leg. Additionally, testimony concerning the physical injury suffered by the victim is an element which was properly considered by the jury in its deliberations, since the 12-year-old victim stated that she had blood in her panties after the assault."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.A.P. v. State · JAP v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.