Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

494 So. 2d 749

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 12, 1985

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1985-11-12

Relies on Magwood v. Alabama · 426 So. 2d 929 - Ex Parte Magwood · 426 So. 2d 918 - Magwood v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-11-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2013

9 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

¶2The appellant, Ernest Clifton Martin, was convicted of the murder of Deputy Sheriff Nathanial Conner, who died as a result of a wound he sustained during a shoot-out between the appellant and deputies from the Marengo County Sheriff's Department. The appellant was found guilty of capital murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. He raises only one issue on appeal.

¶3The appellant was treated at Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital for injuries he received during the shoot-out. While still in the emergency room, the appellant was read his Miranda rights. Also while he was in the hospital, someone in hospital administration requested two hospital psychologists to conduct a mental examination on the appellant. It was determined that appellant knew where he was and what he had done; the findings showed that he was not at that time psychotic.

¶4The appellant presented during his case-in-chief testimony from expert witnesses to establish a defense of insanity. Thereafter, during its rebuttal, the State presented the testimony of the two above-referenced hospital psychologists. The appellant claims that such rebuttal testimony was inadmissible as being violative of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the doctor-patient privilege. It is well established that such testimony is properly admissible. Exparte Day, 378 So.2d 1159 (Ala. 1979), Salmon v. State,460 So.2d 334 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), Free v. State, 455 So.2d 137 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), Magwood v. State, 426 So.2d 918 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982), aff'd, 426 So.2d 929 (Ala.), cert. denied462 U.S. 1124, 103 S.Ct. 3097, 77 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1983).

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6All the Judges concur.

/494/so2d/749 · .json · Public domain