Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 So. 2d 922 - Elder v. State

494 So. 2d 922 - Elder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2013

8 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Aldridge v. State · Ex Parte Rutledge · United States v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A defendant who is indicted for a capital offense may plead guilty to it, but the state must in any event prove the defendant's guilt of the capital offense beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. The guilty plea may be considered in determining whether the state has met that burden of proof. The guilty plea shall have the effect of waiving all nonjurisdictional defects in the proceeding resulting in the conviction except the sufficiency of the evidence. A defendant convicted of a capital offense after pleading guilty to it shall be sentenced according to the provisions of Section 13A-5-43 (d)."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[§] 13A-5-42 . . . required that [the defendant's] guilt be proved beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury, even though he had pleaded guilty. This requirement could not be waived. It was jurisdictional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the jury was selected by the agreement of both the prosecution and the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.