494 So. 2d 969 - Muhammad v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2017 · most notably Wright v. Illinois (1987), Hunter v. State (1995)
1 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Jones v. Howard · Cryts v. French · Bottoson v. Florida · Pope v. Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reports of experts are `merely advisory to the [trial court], which itself retains the responsibility of the decision.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peede v. State · Hunter v. State“he has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understandingand whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he record affirmatively shows that [the defendant] was literate, competent, and understanding, and that he was voluntarily exercising his informed free will”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.