Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
October 1979
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ramirez v. State · Mitchell v. State · Espinosa v. State · Ex Parte Chavez · Taylor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . collateral attacks are not permitted on the original conviction upon which probation has been revoked, but in the present case it has been shown that under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court the appellant was denied the right to counsel. To require a separate habeas corpus proceeding to attack such a conviction would be to require a useless thing.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We have concluded that the admonition with this omission fails to meet the requirements of the statute”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bosworth v. State · Guster v. State“the essential ingredients requisite for minimal compliance with Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., were present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bosworth v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.