Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 SW3D 467 - B.H. v. Commonwealth

B.H. v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Gault · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · DR v. Com. · Commonwealth v. Elza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Preservation is immaterial if there can be no appeal of a case. Waiver of the right to appeal differs starkly from simply failing to make a proper evidentiary or legal objection. Waiving an evidentiary error may result in that error not being considered on appeal, but waiver of making any defense by admitting guilt, or an unconditional admission, prevents any appeal [other than one claiming that no offense has been charged].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “That effect includes barring any appeal, other than one claiming that no offense has been charged, unless the admission is conditioned on the juvenile's being able to appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he effect of the guilty plea is to waive those other defenses and any appeal that seeks to raise them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.