Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 U.S. 922 - Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

646
cited by 646 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
22
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

344 federal appellate · 52 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 646 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Mead Corp. (2001), Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. (1990)

344 federal appellate · 52 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 22 states

5390199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDepartment of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7101 · 5 U.S.C. § 7102 · 5 U.S.C. § 7103 · 5 U.S.C. § 7106 · 5 U.S.C. § 7117

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Shimer · Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 646 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “give[s] reasonable content to the statute's textual ambiguities.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is not a task we ought to undertake on the agency's behalf in reviewing its orders.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he duty to bargain in good faith shall, to the extent not inconsistent with any Federal law or any Government-wide rule or regulation, extend to matters which are the subject of any rule or regulation only if the rule or regulation is not a Government-wide rule or regulation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.