Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 A2D 1241 - State v. Pendexter

State v. Pendexter’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2016

12 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reilly · State v. Smith · State v. McKenney · State v. Johnson · State v. Clarke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “central question is whether the comment is fairly based on the facts in evidence”). The mandate contained in M. Bar R. 3.7(e)(2)(v) must be scrupulously followed by prosecutors, whose duty is not to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.