State v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 10 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 848 F. Supp. 2d 107 - Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. (2012), Commonwealth v. Ruffen (1987)
3 federal appellate · 10 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Scanlon · United States v. Nez · State v. Johnson · State v. Engstrom · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n contrast to the offer of proof made by defense counsel in State v. Davis, 406 A.2d 900, 901 (Me.1979), here defense counsel did not, as was required of him by M.R.Evid. 103(a), make known to the court the substance of the ... testimony that was to be used to establish what the Defendant claimed was the victim’s lack of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.