Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 A2D 330 - Cushman v. Cushman

Cushman v. Cushman’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2023

16 state decisions

8019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grishman v. Grishman · Fournier v. Fournier · Shirley v. Shirley · Skelton v. Skelton · Axtell v. Axtell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The showing required to overcome the presumption is one of fact; thus, the decision of the divorce court whether the burden was successfully carried is reviewable only for clear error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.