State v. O'DONNELL’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2016
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Cummings · State v. Blanchard · State v. Samson · State v. Rathburn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to be limited to a person convicted of a crime alleged in the charging instrument and”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the sentencing provisions of our criminal code, a court is authorized to require “[ejvery natural person convicted of a crime ... to make restitution as authorized by chapter 54” (emphasis added) 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-A). Whether restitution is imposed directly or as a condition of probation under § 1204(2-A)(B), a sentencing justice may only require a convicted person “[t]o make restitution pursuant to chapter 54_” Id. To require restitution beyond the limits of the statute is an invalid order that exceeds the court’s authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LaCasce“[e]very natural person convicted of a crime ... to make restitution as authorized by chapter 54.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LA CASCE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.