Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 A2D 828 - Howard v. Proctor

Howard v. Proctor’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Teel v. Colson · Pattershall v. Jenness · Pettitt v. Lizotte · Henry v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 509 Harm Done by Abnormally Dangerous Domestic Animals (1) A possessor of a domestic animal that he knows or has reason to know has dangerous propensities abnormal to its class, is subject to liability for harm done by the animal to another, although he has exercised the utmost care to prevent it from doing the harm. (2) This liability is limited to harm that results from the abnormally dangerous propensity of which the possessor knows or has reason to know.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.