Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 BR 522 - In re Rosa

In re Rosa’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325

Relies on In re Szostek · In Re Carlton Dana Pratt · Andrews v. Loheit · Foster v. Double R Ranch Ass'n (In Re Foster) · In Re James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that ‘surrender’ does not transfer title to the property. But Congress spoke of ‘vesting’ not ‘surrender,’ in section 1322(b)(9). Under familiar rules of statutory interpretation, courts presume that, when Congress uses different words, it means different things. The plain meaning of ‘vesting’ includes a present transfer of ownership. Thus, section 1322(b)(9) permits inclusion of [the vesting provision].” Id. at 524.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.