Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 F.2d 209 - Jones v. Carlson

Jones v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

495 F.2d 209 · 1974

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Thompson v. United States, Federal Prison Industries · James X. Waddell v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden · Green v. United States · Paden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the administration of federal prisons primary responsibility for supervision is delegated by statute to the Bureau of Prisons under the direction of the Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. § 4001 and 4042. Under that authority the Bureau has promulgated rules and regulations for the proper administration of the various prisons and has established effective means to review actions taken by local prison officials. Green v. United States, 283 F.2d 687 (3 Cir. 1960). In line with these regulations, grievances of prisoners concerning prison administration should be presented to the Bureau through the available administrati[ve] channels. Only after such remedies are exhausted will the court entertain the application for relief in an appropriate case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.