United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
495 F.2d 668 · 1974
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 1992
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 500
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Jones v. United States · Brown v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 262-265 [ 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 ] suggests three alternatives which may be used to establish standing, (1) substantial proprietary or possessory interest in the thing seized, (2) a similar interest in the premises searched, and (3) legitimate presence on the premises searched. Of these, only (1) has application here. Defendant says that he has “automatic” standing to contest the seizure because evidence of a possessory interest at the time of seizure both convicts and confers standing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.