Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 F.2d 883 - Junior Chamber of Commerce of Rochester, Inc. v. United States Jaycees

Junior Chamber of Commerce of Rochester, Inc. v. United States Jaycees’s Empirical Analysis

495 F.2d 883 · 1974

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2003 · most notably Junior Chamber of Commerce of Rochester, Inc. v. United States Jaycees (1974), United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees (1981)

20 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

2801974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Bell v. Hood · Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will assume jurisdiction in order to decide whether the allegation stated a cause of action on which the court could grant relief as well as to determine the issues of fact arising in the controversy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “correctly entertained the action and then dismissed it because of plaintiff's failure to show a substantial federal question”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that a suit may sometimes be dismissed for want of jurisdiction where the alleged claim under the Constitution or federal statutes clearly appears to be immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.