Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 F.3d 1182 - Lane v. Simon

Lane v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis

495 F.3d 1182 · 2007

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Smith v. United States (2009), Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District No. 38 (2009)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

130200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Erickson v. Pardus · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Weinstein v. Bradford · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]pecific facts are not necessary; the statement need only give the defendant fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.