United States v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
495 F.3d 142 · 2007
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022 · most notably Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder (2010), United States v. DiFalco (2016)
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his training and experience amply [qualifies the expert] to give testimony [on the topic for which he or she is being qualified].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.