Ngo v. Storlie’s Empirical Analysis
495 F.3d 597 · 2007
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2024
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Scott v. Harris · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Tennessee v. Garner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven though Storlie was responding to a severe crime-a fellow officer had been shot-a reasonable officer arriving at the scene would have recognized that Ngo did not pose an immediate threat to the officers' safety or the safety of others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Neal v. Ficcadenti“The right to be free from excessive force in the context of an arrest is a clearly established right under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable seizures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.