495 F. Supp. 348 - Sonntag v. Dooley’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7501 (Civil Service Due Process Amendments) · 5 U.S.C. § 7511
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Butz v. Economou · Arnett v. Kennedy · Davis v. Passman · Jenkins v. McKeithen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no independent jurisdiction to consider the state law claim of defamation contained in Count II.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sonntag v. Dooley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.