Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY

U.S. District Court

Decided August 2, 2006

U.S. District Court · decided 2006-08-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2007

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Before the Court is the motion to intervene filed by the City of Youngstown pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F). (Doc. No. 207). The motion is granted.

¶3 Counsel for the City of Youngstown is directed to file the Complaint in Intervention which was attached to the motion, 1 *713 taking care to use the event “Intervenor’s Complaint” when making this electronic filing.

¶4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

¶5 . Counsel should also be sure to file a clean copy, not the one currently attached to the motion, which contains an automatic header labeling it as Doc. No. 207-3. The ECF system will attached a new header once the new document is filed.