Lepper v. Lepper’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Meehan v. Meehan · Marriage of Poret v. Martin · Holman v. Holman · 164 Ind. App. 615 - Carlile v. Carlile · Tucker v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review to determine whether a trial court has abused its discretion in modifying a support order is well settled. We do not weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but rather consider only the evidence most favorable to the judgment, together with the reasonable inferences which can be drawn therefrom. If, from that viewpoint, there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court, it will not be disturbed, even though we might have reached a different conclusion had we been the triers of fact. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lepper v. Lepper“While the four factors of Section 12 may be relevant to modification of a child support order, and while a trial court therefore may appropriately consider them, a trial court does not necessarily commit reversible error by failing to ex pressly consider the four factors when modifying a child support order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lepper v. Lepper“17(a) Provisions of an order with respect to child support ... may be modified or revoked. Such modification shall be made only upon a showing of changed cireumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lepper v. Lepper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.