State v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Leake (2005), State v. Taylor (2002)
1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barefoot v. Estelle · State v. Spreigl · State v. Billstrom · State v. Wahlberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n final argument to the jury, a prosecutor is governed by a unique set of rules which differ significantly from those governing counsel in civil suits, and even from those governing defense counsel in the very same criminal trial. These special rules follow directly from the prosecutor’s inherently unique role in the criminal justice system, which mandates that the prosecutor not act as a zealous advocate for criminal punishment, but as the representative of the people in an effort to seek justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“argument is in some respects out-of-bounds,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]rguably, the waitress incident was admissible as part of the occurrence or episode out of which the offense charges against the defendant arose.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Minn. R.Crim. P. 7.02; State v. Johnson, 322 N.W.2d 220, 222 (Minn.1982)). Quoting McCormick on Evidence § 190, at 558 (Edward W. Cleary ed., 3d ed. 1984), we explained that the waitress incident helped to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Riddley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.