Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 P3D 478 - JIM (JAY) VS. STATE

JIM (JAY) VS. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on South Dakota v. Opperman · Horton v. California · Harris v. United States · Colorado v. Bertine · Florida v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While an officer's failure to complete an inventory per department policy may foreclose the inventory warrant exception, such a failure does not per se establish that an officer's motive for beginning an inventory was a subterfuge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “ensure[ ] that an inventory search is truly designed to produce an inventory and is not just a ruse for a general rummaging . . . to discover incriminating evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.