Commonwealth v. Glass’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Commonwealth v. Banks · Commonwealth v. Polimeni · Commonwealth v. Garcia · Commonwealth v. Lasch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o warrant a characterization as prejudicial the testimony must convey to the jury, either expressly or by reasonable implication, the fact of a prior criminal offense.” Commonwealth v. Glass, 495 Pa. 405, 408 , 434 A.2d 707, 709 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 932 , 102 S.Ct. 1984 , 72 L.Ed.2d 450 (1982). Nevertheless, we feel compelled to employ an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.