495 So. 2d 1181 - Tingley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. O'Connell · Amalg. Transit Union v. Pub. Emp. Rel. Com'n · 459 So. 2d 306 - Tucker v. State · 298 So. 2d 376 - State v. Beamon · Pickeron v. State of Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The better-reasoned rule appears to us to be that unless time is a specific element of a certain crime, it is not a substantive, essential part of the indictment. A conviction may be obtained for a crime even though there is a variance between the dates proved at trial and those alleged in the indictment, so long as the indictment and proofs show the crime was committed before the return date of the indictment and within any applicable statute of limitations time period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not argue that the amendment occurred too close in time to the trial to prevent him from being able to effectively present a defense, or that it delayed, or hampered his defense at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.