Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 So. 2d 1298 - McLean v. Hunter

495 So. 2d 1298 - McLean v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

181
cited by 181 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 180 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 181 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco (1989), Clement v. Frey (1996)

1 federal appellate · 180 state decisions

8001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. · 388 So. 2d 707 - Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co. · 466 So. 2d 1280 - Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. · 464 So. 2d 329 - Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Langlois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the right to subpoena any ... dentist ... for trial to establish the ... degree of care ordinarily exercised.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The very purpose of requiring a proffer is to preserve excluded testimony so that the testimony (whatever its nature) is available for appellate review. Without a proffer, appellate courts have no way of ascertaining the nature of the excluded testimony.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A. When the court rules against the admissibility of any evidence, it shall either permit the party offering such evidence to make a complete record thereof, or permit the party to make a statement setting forth the nature of the evidence.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.