Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 SO2D 1346 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Foster v. State (1994), Evans v. State (1997)

47 state decisions

1701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 481 So. 2d 203 - Fisher v. State · Johnson v. State · 471 So. 2d 332 - Cabello v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Capital cases based on consideration of a heightened standard of review; (2) Crowds threatening violence toward the accused; (3) An inordinate amount of media coverage, particularly in cases of (a) serious crimes against influential families; (b) serious crimes against public officials; (c) serial crimes; (d) crimes committed by a black defendant upon a white victim; (e) where there is inexperienced trial counsel.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[U]pon proper application, there arises a presumption that such sentiment exists; and, the state then bears the burden of rebutting that presumption.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the trial court has overruled a motion to suppress the confession of a defendant, this Court will reverse the trial court's decision only if the trial court's ruling `is manifestly in error or contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.