495 So. 2d 191 - Strong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

cited by 9 later decisions

states following

February 2015

most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Griffin v. Texas · State v. Webb · 438 So. 2d 380 - Lightbourne v. State · Hetland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“that description could have fit many men. See Strong v. State, 495 So.2d 191, 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), review denied, 503 So.2d 328 (Fla.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1049 , 107 S.Ct. 2180 , 95 L.Ed.2d 837 (1987); see also Williams v. State, 454 So.2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Ross v. State, 419 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Taylor v. State
“Although appellant fit the general description of the anonymous tip, that description could have fit many men.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 666 So. 2d 1035 - Sanders v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.