495 So. 2d 286 - State v. Deese’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 486 So. 2d 592 - Funchess v. Wainwright · 453 So. 2d 1351 - SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. Resources · 439 So. 2d 880 - VanBibber v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Ins. Co. · 387 So. 2d 943 - State v. Hagan · 434 So. 2d 879 - DEPT. OF LEGAL AFF. v. Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Ejvery enlightened court will be admonished ... of how delicate a character is the duty imposed upon it when called to decide upon the constitutionality of an act of the Legislature. While it is an essential element in the character of an independent judiciary firmly to maintain and resolutely to exercise its appropriate powers when properly invoked, it is equally its duty to be careful not rashly and inconsiderately to trench upon or invade the precincts of the other departments of the government. That the judicial department is the proper power in the government to determine whether a statute be or be no constitutional will not, at this day, be questioned. That matter, though once mooted by no less a man than Thomas Jefferson, was put finally to test by the decision in the case of Marbury v Madison, wherein C.J. Marshall gave it the sanction of his great name. But it is a most grave and important power, not to be exercised lightly or rashly, nor in any case where it cannot be made to appear plainly that the Legislature has exceeded its powers. If there exist upon the mind of the court a reasonable doubt, that doubt must be given in favor of the law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Paige v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.