495 So. 2d 5 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2008
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Dutton v. Evans · Douglas v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a showing of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Williams v. State“are in a sense hearsay rules elevated to constitutional status”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“post-arrest statements made by one accused pointing the finger at another are as a matter of common experience among the least trustworthy of statements... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.