495 So. 2d 733 - Rayburn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2021
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Castaneda v. Partida · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Davis v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process.'”
14 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. State · Pierce v. State“'fair cross section' requirement . . . is analogous to the requirement, derived from the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, . . . that 'petit juries must be drawn from a source fairly representative of the community.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Bird · Wimberly v. State“`petit juries must be drawn from a source fairly representative of the community.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.