495 So. 2d 876
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 9, 1986
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-10-09
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1988
3 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“remanded for resentencing within the presumptive guideline range.”
quoted by 2 later decisions, including Patten v. State, 518 So. 2d 1336 - Smith v. State
Relies on 489 So. 2d 25 - Scurry v. State · 492 So. 2d 410 - Dixon v. State · 490 So. 2d 176 - Kirk v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1None of the reasons for departing from the presumptive guideline sentence given by the lower court in this case presents a valid basis for departure. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); Dixon v. State, 492 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) and Kirk v. State, 490 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus, this case is remanded for resentencing within the presumptive guideline range.
¶2REMANDED.