Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 10, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-10-10

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1990

3 state decisions

Relies on 449 So. 2d 398 - State v. Ryder · Etheridge v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-10-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See State v. Ryder, 449 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) and Etheridge v. State, 415 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

RYDER, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.SCHOONOVER, J., concurs specially.SCHOONOVER, Judge,

¶2Concurring Specially.

¶3I agree that the state presented sufficient evidence to convict the appellant. Because the appellant’s argument concerning the application of the speedy trial rule is controlled by our decision in Ryder, I also agree that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for discharge. Were we not bound by that decision, however, I would reverse for the reasons set forth in my dissent in Ryder.