Gary James Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Wheeler v. State · Hart v. State · Salazar v. State · Alexander v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant’s possession of child pornography constitutes some proof that Appellant intended to solicit more child pornography. ... Appellant’s possession of pornography was some proof that he is sexually attracted to prepubescent girls.’’). It further includes the download log, which contains titles such as: “Preteen art”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the probative value of the evidence; (2) the potential to impress the jury in some irrational, yet indelible, way; (3) the time needed to develop the evidence; and (4) the proponent's need for the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lamerand v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.