Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 495 U.S. 1 - Florida v. Wells

Florida v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1,517
cited by 1,517 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
40
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

357 federal appellate · 103 district · 726 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,517 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Whren v. United States (1996), Florida v. Jimeno (1991)

357 federal appellate · 103 district · 726 state decisions — followed in 40 states

58001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on South Dakota v. Opperman · United States v. Chadwick · Arkansas v. Sanders · Colorado v. Bertine · Illinois v. Lafayette

Cited together with Colorado v. Bertine · South Dakota v. Opperman · Illinois v. Lafayette · Terry v. Ohio · Whren v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,517 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an inventory search must not be a ruse for a general rummaging in order to discover incriminating evidence”
    64 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “had no policy whatever with respect to the opening of closed containers encountered during an inventory search”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a ruse for a general rummaging in order to discover incriminating evidence.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.