George v. Strick Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.2d 10 · 1974
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977), Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1980)
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. · Volkswagen Interamericana, S.A. v. Rohlsen · Crescent Corporation v. Martin · Hines v. Clendenning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]ertinent federal cases do not compel state courts to open their doors to every suit which meets the minimum contacts requirements of the due process clause of the federal constitution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“confers jurisdiction 'to the outer limits' of due process”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In personam jurisdiction over certain nonresidents—Service of process—Venue (a) Any person, firm, or corporation other than a foreign insurer licensed to do business in the State of Oklahoma whether or not such party is a citizen or resident of this State and who does, or who has done, any of the acts hereinafter enumerated, whether in person or through another, submits himself, or shall have submitted himself, and if an individual his personal representative, to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State as to any cause of action arising, or which shall have arisen, from the doings of said acts: (1) the transaction of any business within this State; (2) the commission of any act within this State; (3) the manufacture or distribution of a product which is sold in the regular course of business within this State and is used within this State; (4) contracting to insure any person, property, or risk located within this State at the time of contracting. (b) Nothing herein contained limits or affects the right to serve any process in any other manner now or hereafter provided by law. (c) In addition to the other counties in which an action may be brought against a nonresident of this State, an action which is brought under this section where all defendants are nonresidents of the State may be brought in the county where the cause of action arose or in the county where the plaintiff or one of the plaintiffs resides. If one or more of the defendants is a resident of this State, t”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.