Margie J. Threlkeld v. Stanley v. Tucker, (Two Cases)’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.2d 1101 · 1974
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc. (1977), Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977)
15 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Angel v. Bullington · Adam v. Saenger · Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“coextensive with the outer limits of due process under the state and federal constitutions, as those limits have been defined by the United States Supreme Court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(D)ue process requires only that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] court of this state may exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.