Mariash v. Morrill’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.2d 1138 · 1974
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (1981), Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977)
42 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Hanson v. Denckla · National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, required to justify the federal government's exercise of power over them, are present. Indeed, the”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““in the district wherein the defendant is found or is an inhabitant or transacts business or in the district where the offer or sale took place...” 15 U.S.C. § 77v. (Securities Act) “[the district] wherein any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred ... or in the district wherein the defendant is found or is an inhabitant or transacts business ...” 15 U.S.C. § 78aa (Exchange Act) “any district in which such person resides, is found, has an agent, or transacts his affairs.” 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (a) (RICO).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘[A]ny use of instrumentalities of the mails or other interstate facilities made within the forum district constituting an important step in ... [the] consummation [of the fraudulent scheme] is sufficient’ for venue to lie in that district.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.