Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 F.2d 1285 - Fred Cooper, Etc. v. Honorable Enoch T. Nix, Etc., Etc.

Fred Cooper, Etc. v. Honorable Enoch T. Nix, Etc., Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

496 F.2d 1285 · 1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Moody v. Flowers · Cook v. United States · Sands v. Wainwright · Pratz v. Louisiana Polytechnic Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is argued that the parietal rules which we today uphold require students to live in dormitories “under the guise of having students receive a complete education through the ‘living and learning experience’ of campus communal living.” (Emphasis theirs.) We simply do not feel the numerous outstanding educators, many of national renown, who submitted affidavits in this case to the effect that the living and learning center concept is a very valuable educational tool would say so unless this indeed was their sound, professional, expert opinion. It is a travesty of a sort even to infer they would be parties to any sort of disguised scheme to protect the interests of bondholders who bought the bonds within parietal covenants to protect their investments. As already stated, the living and learning center concept was being followed here long prior to promulgation of the contested rules. Generation after generation of students have profited from such an experience. Only recently did this concept, formerly adhered to voluntarily, have to be placed in writing and made mandatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.