United States ex rel. Bailey v. U. S. Commanding Officer of the Office of the Provost Marshal’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.2d 324 · 1974
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2007 · most notably Conforte v. Commissioner (1982), United States v. Pole No. 3172 (1988)
29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty. · Molinaro v. New Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conduct in seeking to invoke the processes of the law while flouting them”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“preserve the writ of habeas corpus as a remedy for severe restraints on individual liberty. Since habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy whose operation is to a large extent uninhibited by traditional rules of finality and federalism, its use has been limited to cases of special urgency, leaving more conventional remedies for cases in which the restraints on liberty are neither severe nor immediate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tinder v. Paula
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.