¶1Sheldon V. Burman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
¶2Stephen Schlakman, Wien, Lane & Malkin, New York City, for defendantsappéllees. '
¶3Before HASTIE, ANDERSON and HASTINGS, Judges.
¶4ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE UNDER RULE 28
¶6The court having considered the record, briefs and oral arguments on this appeal and having found no reversible error in the decision of the District Court, the judgment is affirmed.