Womer v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.2d 99 · 1974
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2002
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Goldberg v. Kelly · Williams v. People of State of New York · Arnett v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(N)or shall (any person) be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Devine v. Goodstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.