Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 F.3d 1321 - West v. Tillman

West v. Tillman’s Empirical Analysis

496 F.3d 1321 · 2007

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Goebert v. Lee County (2007), Case v. Eslinger (2009)

10 federal appellate ·

270200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Lee v. Ferraro · Lassiter v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by evidence of (1) “a custom or policy that results in deliberate indifference to constitutional rights,” (2) “facts that support an inference that the supervisor! ] directed the subordinates to act unlawfully or knew that the subordinates would act unlawfully and failed to stop them from doing so,” or (3) “a history of widespread abuse” that notified the supervisor of the need to correct the alleged deprivation, but [s]he failed to do so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A causal connection may be established when: 1) a ‘history of widespread abuse’ puts the responsible supervisor on notice of the need to correct the alleged deprivation, and he or she fails to do so; 2) a supervisor’s custom or policy results in deliberate indifference to constitutional rights; or 3) facts support an inference that the supervisor directed subordinates to act unlawfully or knew that subordinates would act unlawfully and failed to stop them from doing so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]o one is entitled to an error-free bureaucracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.