Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 F.3d 366 - Milligan v. Trautman

Milligan v. Trautman’s Empirical Analysis

496 F.3d 366 · 2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Walden v. McGinnes · In Re Brothers · In Re Young · LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. Sleutel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Exempting all money traceable to a [whole-life insurance policy, exempt under section 1108.51 of the Texas Insurance Code] would allow people to use such policies merely to avoid creditors. People could place their money in a whole-life policy .... Sometime later — presumably even after only a few days — they could withdraw some of the money, or even all of it, forever shielding the money from creditors. That can’t be the law. Less insidiously, someone desiring to have a whole-life policy actually for insurance reasons nonetheless could put her extra money into the policy simply to shield it from creditors. That also can’t be the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.