Harrison v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
496 F.3d 419 · 2007
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Moore (2011), Richards v. Quarterman (2009)
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Lindh v. Murphy · Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden · Neal v. Puckett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in this case, there exists a 'reasonable probability' that, but for counsel's errors, the jury might have reached a different verdict,” but remanding for evidentiary hearing to determine what witness's testimony would have been because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.