Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 MICH 199 - People v. Tanner

People v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To the extent that a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress involves an interpretation of the law or the application of a constitutional standard to uncontested facts, our review is de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The primary objective in interpreting a constitutional provision is to determine the text's original meaning to the ratifiers, the people, at the time of ratification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “people are understood to have accepted the words employed in a constitutional provision in the sense most obvious to the common understanding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.