Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 MICH 91 - People v. Wilson

People v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serv[e] to turn the jury's otherwise inconsistent and irrational verdict into a consistent and rational verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the factual determinations actually and necessarily made by the jury,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]he problem is that the same jury reached inconsistent results.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.