Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 N.E.2d 604 - Conn v. State

Conn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016

9 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Ventresca · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States · Steele v. United States No. 1

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(c) Following the final disposition of the cause at trial level or any other final disposition: (1) Property which may be lawfully possessed shall be returned to its rightful owner, if known. If ownership is unknown, a reasonable attempt shall be made by the law enforcement agency holding the property to ascertain ownership of the property."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hicks v. State · Sinn v. State
  2. “"[Alllows the police to seize items without a warrant if three requirements are met. First, the police officer must lawfully be in a place or position from which he can view the property seized. (Citation omitted.) Second, the items must be discovered inadvertently during the course of a valid search. (Citation omitted.) Finally, it must be immediately apparent to the officer upon discovery that the item is evidence of a crime or contraband. (Citations omitted.)"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Maynard v. State
  3. “When the police conduct a search authorized by a warrant which does not mention certain items the police expect to find during the search, reliance on plain view is pretense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Maynard v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.