Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 496 NW2D 50 - State v. Pippin

State v. Pippin’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2024

16 state decisions

701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Rambousek · Schumacher v. Schumacher · 67 Wash. App. 486 - State v. Mead · 56 Wash. App. 176 - State v. Harrington · Van Klootwyk v. Arman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must exist an immediate and intimate causal connection between the criminal conduct and the damages or expenses for which restitution is ordered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “limited to those directly related to the criminal offense and expenses actually incurred as a direct result of the defendant's criminal action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.